client portal
  • Legal Leaders logo
  • Blue Forbes logo
  • AVVO 10.0
  • Top 100 Lawyers badge
  • Daily Business Review Newspaper
  • Legal Elite 2012 Badge
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer, Adrian Philip Thomas

A Curator’s Concern

Written by on Jun 15, 2009| Posted in: General

Court of Appeals Says Curator Cannot Impose Lien on Occupied Homestead Property

What is a Curator?

Sometimes curators are appointed by the probate court to administer the estate under certain circumstances where a personal representative or executor cannot serve. There are a variety of these situations, but what always remains the same is the general duty of the curator to collect the testator’s effects, pay claims against his estate, and distribute the residue to those entitled. Also uniform, is the well settled law in Florida that curator or personal representative does not have an unrestricted right to use estate assets as his own, and the probate code provides that assets of an estate shall be assets in the hands of personal representative or curator for specific purposes only, with significant restriction that he or she act reasonably for the benefit of the interested persons. A curator’s possession of estate assets derives from his appointment and is not an individual right of possession; thus, the personal representative or curator acquires interest solely as fiduciary, holding legal title, but the representative does not hold beneficial title to assets and has no right to dispose of estate assets for his own use.

How Is A Curator or Personal Representative Paid?

What does a curator or personal representative do when they have performed their duties, acted as a faithful fiduciary, and there are not enough assets in the estate to be pay their fee? This was the question raised in the Fourth District Court of Appeals in Herrilka v. Yates, –So.2d–, 2009 WL 1531772, 34 Fla.L.Weekly D1117a (Fla. 4th DCA, June 3, 2009).

In Herrilka, the Broward County Probate Court appointed a curator, attorney Yates, when a dispute arose as to who should be named personal representative (at least two persons claiming to be the surviving spouse.) After her appointment, Yates performed work for the estate, however, it was argued that her services were not conducted for the specific purpose of preserving, insuring, and protecting the homestead property. The homestead property was occupied by one of the persons claiming to be the decedent’s surviving spouse, Constance Herrilka.

Since there were insufficient funds in the probate estate to pay Yates’ legal bill, she asked the probate court under Fla.Stat. §733.608 for a lien to be imposed against the homestead property. The pertinent parts of section 733.608 are:

(2) If property that reasonably appears to the personal representative to be protected homestead is not occupied by a person who appears to have an interest in the property, the personal representative is authorized, but not required, to take possession of that property for the limited purpose of preserving, insuring, and protecting it for the person having an interest in the property, pending a determination of its homestead status. If the personal representative takes possession of that property, any rents and revenues may be collected by the personal representative for the account of the heir or devisee, but the personal representative shall have no duty to rent or otherwise make the property productive.

(3) If the personal representative expends funds or incurs obligations to preserve, maintain, insure, or protect the property referenced in subsection (2), the personal representative shall be entitled to a lien on that property and its revenues to secure repayment of those expenditures and obligations incurred. These expenditures and obligations incurred, including, but not limited to, fees and costs, shall constitute a debt owed to the personal representative that is charged against and which may be secured by a lien on the protected homestead, as provided in this section. The debt shall include any amounts paid for these purposes after the decedent’s death and prior to the personal representative’s appointment to the extent later ratified by the personal representative in the court proceeding provided for in this section. § 733.608(2)-(3) (emphasis added).

On appeal, the Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed the Broward County Probate Court because: (1) Yates has not, and cannot, take possession of the property, as it is occupied by an “interested person;” and (2) the fees incurred by Yates for which the lien was imposed were not incurred for the purpose of preserving, maintaining, insuring, or protecting the homestead property. According to the Fourth District, these requirements must be met by the statute’s clear language as a precondition to a curator requesting a lien in lieu of payment of her legal bill from an insolvent estate. Further, the Fourth District was concerned that Constance Herrilka still lived in the property and was an “interested person” as defined by the probate code:

In this case, the trial court erred in imposing the lien because the homestead property was never taken into possession, either legally or factually, by Yates, as Constance still occupies it. This failure to take possession negates a claim for the imposition of the lien because, to do so, section 733.608 first requires that the personal representative take possession of the property “for the limited purpose of preserving, insuring, and protecting it.” § 733.608(2). Furthermore, Yates cannot legally take possession of the property because it is “occupied by a person who appears to have an interest in the property,” id., i.e., Constance. Constance is an “interested person” because, by potentially being Joseph’s surviving spouse and joint owner of the property, as well as being the property’s current occupant, she is a “person who may reasonably be expected to be affected by the outcome of the particular proceeding involved.” Id. § 731.201(23)….Even if Yates met the threshold possession requirement of section 733.608, the lien was still not properly imposed. This is because the expenses the lien represents were incurred for legal services having to do with the administration of the Estate. The services, as required by section 733.608(3), were not incurred for the specific purpose of preserving, maintaining, insuring, or protecting the homestead property.”

Personal Representatives and Curators need to be mindful that in order to have a lien on homestead property the threshold requirements that the property not to be occupied by a person who appears to have an interest and that the personal representative or curator take possession must be meet.

We can make a difference.
Call now for a complimentary consultation.
Toll Free 1-800-249-8125

Phone: (954) 764-7273
Fax: (954) 764-7274

Las Olas Square
515 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1050
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Email Disclaimer
Contacting us by email does not establish an attorney-client relationship. You should not send us any confidential information and we will not treat as confidential any information you choose to provide. Proceeding to send us an email via this online link acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.