client portal
  • Legal Leaders logo
  • Blue Forbes logo
  • AVVO 10.0
  • Top 100 Lawyers badge
  • Daily Business Review Newspaper
  • Legal Elite 2012 Badge
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer, Adrian Philip Thomas

Florida Guardianship and Examining Committee Reports

Written by on Jan 16, 2013| Posted in: Guardianship Litigation

When there are concerns that a loved-one may have limited mental capacity, it may be appropriate to petition the Court for implementation of a guardianship.  However, courts view guardianships as a last resort, and they will not usually grant them if there is a sufficient less restrictive alternative to guardianship.  Examples of these less restrictive alternatives would be a power of attorney, a healthcare surrogate, and/or a trust.

Nevertheless, there are times when courts have to intervene and initiate a guardianship.  Once a petition to determine incapacity is filed, the court orders that three (3) examining committee members assess the alleged incapacitated person’s mental health and they provide recommendations to the court as to whether or not they believe that a guardianship should be initiated by the court.

However, there has been some recent case law that may shed some light as to how strictly the court should consider these examining committee reports.  In Rothman v Rothman, 93 So.3d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), a petition to determine incapacity was filed and the examining committee member performed their assessment of the alleged incapacitated person.  Two (2) of the three (3) committee members found there to be no incapacity, while the other recommended a limited guardianship.  Pursuant to Fla. Stat. 744.331(4), the alleged incapacitated person requested the dismissal of the petition because a majority of the committee members concluded that there is no incapacity.  The trial court found Fla. Stat. 744.331(4) to be unconstitutional and denied the dismissal of the petition.  This court order was later appealed, and the appellate court cited In re Keene, 343 So.2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), which held that Fla. Stat. 744.331(4) should be strictly construed by the court and, as a result, the appellate court found that the trial court had erred in not dismissing the petition.

A guardianship should be viewed as a last resort; however, there are restrictions that the court must consider in determining how to handle a proposed guardianship.  Although courts are given great deference in assessing most situations, there is a proper procedure that the court must follow in implementing a guardianship and it is reversible error for the court to disregard these rules.

If you are concerned for a loved-one’s mental health and his or her ability to handle their finances, it would be wise to contact a Florida guardianship attorney to assess the viability and appropriateness of initiating a guardianship.


We can make a difference.
Call now for a complimentary consultation.
Toll Free 1-800-249-8125

Phone: (954) 764-7273
Fax: (954) 764-7274

Las Olas Square
515 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1050
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Email Disclaimer
Contacting us by email does not establish an attorney-client relationship. You should not send us any confidential information and we will not treat as confidential any information you choose to provide. Proceeding to send us an email via this online link acknowledges that you understand and agree with this notice.